Growing Need for Clean Water Access
There are at least 1.8 billion people on this earth who don’t have access to clean water (United Nations). Living in the heart of one of the most industrialized countries in the world, having clean water pouring freely from our faucets, we often forget just how lucky we are. 10 of our employees have teamed-up for a noble extra curricular pursuit; raising money for a project that would bring clean water solutions to the remote village of Kuiwi Tingny in Nicaragua. The Water Innovators challenge encourages teams to provide innovative solutions to development problems in Nicaragua and raise awareness and funds for Nicaragua.
How your donation can help
- $19 can provide safe water to one person
- $500 could train and equip a small enterprise to offer toilet installation and septic tank maintenance for communities, or the construction of rainwater catchment systems.
- $1,000 could provide a full six-week vocational training course for at-risk adolescent girls to become skilled tradeswomen in water, sanitation and hygiene services.
- $2,500 could equip a small enterprise with the means to drill borehole wells and complete them with manual rope pumps.
Learn More About WaterAid
Written by Stephen R. Henshaw, President and CEO of EnviroForensics
As Seen in the May 2014 issue of the Cleaner & Launderer
Cleaning up soil and groundwater contamination from a release of chlorinated solvents, such as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) can be a time consuming and complicated process. That’s why it is so important for you to build the right team to represent you during this process. That team should understand what your business plans are and your schedule for implementing those plans. Dealing with environmental contamination is a crossroads of where you have been and where you are going with your business and your future. It can be an opportunity that forces you to make decisions that you may not have considered, like, “What do I want to do with the business? What about the property?” If you don’t develop the right team, you could spend a great deal of money addressing the cleanup without having a road map as to what to expect. If you do not have the right team you could have business interruptions from drilling activities, and face a parade of activities that seem never ending. With the right team, you don’t need to become an expert on environmental matters – that’s what you have them for. They’re the experts and they communicate with you so you know what’s going on without needing to take chemistry classes. You should be able to focus on your business, while your team focuses on how to move your project through the site closure process.
The most important thing to understand about this concept of building the right team, is that the team must represent the outcome that you desire, within your expectations, and the team that you rely on needs to be strong enough to give you the truth and their best professional opinions, even when the news is bad. The second most important point is that your team needs to have a good working relationship with one another. Your consultant and your attorney need to be on the same page as to the Site Closure strategy. Depending on the business owner’s future plans, site closure strategies might vary significantly. Your strategy might be to sell your business, but while the property is being remediated, you can’t. You may own the property and want to refinance it, but most banks are reluctant to loan on the property as long as it is impaired. You may have no immediate plans to change your business at all and you just want to control the outflow of cash while you focus on growing your business. These are all different business scenarios that I’ve seen and they all directly affect the site closure strategy. Continue reading “Remediation of PCE and TCE in Impacted Soil and Groundwater Requires Teamwork and Coordination”
Written by Stephen R. Henshaw, President and CEO of EnviroForensics & PolicyFind
As Seen in the March 2014 issue of the Cleaner & Launderer
The environmental remediation industry has been in full swing for the last 35 years, but it has only been in the past few years that the regulatory agencies have come to accept risk-based closures as a practical cleanup strategy. In the recent past, cleanup criteria was established for hundreds of individual chemical constituents for soil, surface water and groundwater. The cleanup criteria was based on the toxicological risks assigned to each of the chemical constituents and then further divided into different land-use scenarios (e.g. residential, commercial, wetlands, etc.)
This process made it easy for people to know what the target cleanup objective would be. That is not to say that there was not frustration over the toxicological science that was used to establish the cleanup criteria, but, because the closure numbers were laid out on a table, it made the discussion with the regulatory agencies black and white.
Continue reading “RISK BASED SITE CLOSURES SHOULD INCLUDE REMEDIATING THE SOURCE AREA”
Written By: Steve Henshaw, President and CEO of EnviroForensics in collaboration with Keith Gaskill, Senior Geochemist, EnviroForensics
As seen in the February 2014 issue of Cleaner & Launderer
When scientists evaluate how to best cleanup groundwater that has been contaminated with chlorinated solvents, such as perchloroethylene (perc) from a drycleaner or trichloroethene from a manufacturing facility, the option of in-situ treatment is considered. If the subsurface conditions are favorable, in-situ (or in-place) remediation can have a lot of advantages to other remedial alternatives.
One of the most common in-situ approaches is the use of bioremediation and reductive dechlorination. The advantages to using in situ bio-remediation or reductive dechlorination technology are that a liquid can be injected into the subsurface using a small drilling rig while there is minimal business interruption. There is no need for an active treatment system involving a trailer or stationary shed with electrical pumps, compressors and treatment tanks. There is no trenching for conveyance lines and electrical wires. There are no costs for routine operation and maintenance, electrical power, or monitoring telemetry. Other advantages to using in situ bio-remediation are that the product is relatively inexpensive, readily available and it is safe and easy to handle. In-situ treatment is particularly favorable when remediating a contaminated groundwater plume that has migrated away from the Site where the release occurred.
Continue reading “Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination It’s A Matter of Give and Take”
Written by Stephen R. Henshaw, President and CEO of EnviroForensics & PolicyFind
As Seen in the January 2014 issue of the Cleaner & Launderer
Those of you who have read my past articles, have heard me speak, or have ever looked at EnviroForensics’ website, know that we specialize in helping dry cleaners work through the regulatory and insurance maze of investigating and remediating soil and groundwater impacts caused by the release of percholoroethene (PCE). The EnviroForensics team takes pride in helping to solve environmental problems for the dry cleaning industry; and over the past 18 years, we have helped more than 400 dry cleaners.
So much has changed since I started working with dry cleaners. The laws and regulations enforced by the regulatory agencies, the cleanup technology, and the perceived human health exposure of vapors, known as vapor intrusion, are continually changing and evolving. It seems that the only constants are that dry cleaners are targets and continue to be blamed when PCE is found in soil and groundwater. PCE is considered a risk to public health, contaminated soil and groundwater makes property transactions difficult to complete, and cleaning up PCE in soil and groundwater is expensive. Oh, and old CGL insurance policies continue to be one of the saving graces for dry cleaners when faced with the daunting reality that they have been named as a party responsible for PCE contamination. Continue reading “Vapor Intrusion – A Concern, but an Easy Fix”